Binomial nomenclature

The formal system of naming species is called binomial nomenclature (especially in botany,[1] but also used by zoologists[2]), binominal nomenclature (since 1953,[3] the technically correct form in zoology[4]), or binary nomenclature.

The essence of this system of naming is this: each species name is formed out of (modern scientific) Latin (or is a Latinized version of other words), and has two parts, the genus name and the species name (also known as the specific epithet), for example, Homo sapiens, the name of the human species. The two-part name of a species is popularly known as the Latin name. However, biologists and philologists prefer to use the term scientific name rather than "Latin name", because the words used to create these names are not always from the Latin language, even though the words have been Latinized in order to make them suitable. Instead names are often derived from ancient Greek word roots, or words from numerous other languages. Frequently species names are based on the surname of a person, such as a well-regarded scientist, or are a Latinized version of a relevant place name.

Carl von Linné (also known as Linnaeus) chose to use a two-word naming system, and did not use what over time came to be a full seven-category system (kingdom-phylum-class-order-family-genus-species.) Linnaeus chose a binomial nomenclature scheme, using only the genus name and the specific name or epithet which together form the whole name of the species. For example, humans belong to genus Homo and their specific name is sapiens. Humans as a species are thus classified as Homo sapiens. The first letter of the first name, the genus, is always capitalized, while that of the second is not, even when derived from a proper noun such as the name of a person or place. Conventionally, all names of genera and lower taxa are always italicised, while family names and higher taxa are printed in plain text. Species can be divided into a further rank, giving rise to a trinomial name for a subspecies (trinomen for animals, ternary name for plants).

Biologists, when using a name of a species, usually also give the authority and date of the species description. Thus zoologists will give the name of a particular sea snail species as: Patella vulgata Linnaeus, 1758. The name "Linnaeus" tells the reader who it was that described the species; 1758 is the date of the publication in which the original description can be found, in this case the book Systema Naturae.

Contents

History

Karl von Linne or Carl von Linné or Carolus Linnaeus (1707–1778), a Swedish botanist, invented the modern system of binomial nomenclature.

The adoption of a system of binomial nomenclature is due to Swedish botanist and physician Carl von Linné also known by his Latinized name Carolus Linnaeus (1707–1778). Linnaeus attempted to describe the entire known natural world, giving every species (mineral, plant, or animal) a two-part name. This was an improvement over descriptive names that involved a whole descriptive phrase comprising numerous words. However, binomial nomenclature in various forms had existed before Linnaeus, and was used by the Bauhins, who lived nearly two hundred years earlier.

Value

The value of the binomial nomenclature system derives primarily from its economy, its widespread use, and the stability of names it generally favors:

Despite the rules favoring stability and uniqueness, in practice a single species may have several scientific names in circulation, depending largely on taxonomic point of view (see synonymy).

Derivation of names

The genus name and specific descriptor may come from any source. Often they are ordinary New Latin words, but they may also come from Ancient Greek, from a place, from a person (often a naturalist), a name from the local language etc. In fact, taxonomists come up with specific descriptors from a variety of sources, including in-jokes and puns.

However, names are always treated grammatically as if they were a Latin phrase.

There is a list of Latin and Greek words commonly used in systematic names.

Family names are often derived from a common genus within the family.

The genus name must be unique inside each kingdom. It is normally a noun in its Latin grammar.

The specific descriptor is also a Latin word but it can be grammatically any of various forms including these:

The same specific name is quite commonly used in two or more different genera (as is shown by examples of hodgsonii above).

Codes of nomenclature

From the mid nineteenth century onwards it became ever more apparent that a body of rules was necessary to govern scientific names. In the course of time these became Nomenclature Codes governing the naming of animals (ICZN), plants (incl. Fungi, cyanobacteria) (ICBN), and bacteria (incl. Archaea) (ICNB). Virus names are governed by a taxonomic code, which determines taxa as well as names (ICTV). These codes differ in certain ways, e.g.:

A BioCode has been suggested to replace several codes, although implementation is not in sight. There is also a code in development for naming clades, called the PhyloCode.

Rules

Although the fine detail differs, there are certain aspects which are universally adopted:

For example, the entire tiger species is Panthera tigris
For example: (plant) Amaranthus retroflexus L., and (animal) Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758) – the latter was described by Linnaeus as Fringilla domestica.
For example: "The house sparrow (Passer domesticus) is decreasing in Europe".
For example: "Canis sp." means "an unspecified species of the genus Canis", while "Canis spp." means "two or more species of the genus Canis".
For example "Corvus cf. splendens" indicates "a bird similar to the House Crow but not certainly identified as this species".

See also

References

  1. "International Code Of Botanical Nomenclature Online". Ibot.sav.sk. http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn/frameset/0046Ch4Sec2a042.htm. Retrieved 2010-03-28. 
  2. Diane Schmidt and George H. Bell, Guide to reference and information sources in the zoological sciences, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2003, ISBN 1563089777, p. 4.
  3. "The International Rules of Zoological Nomenclature, ''INTERNATIONAL BULLETIN OF BACTERIOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY'', Volume 6 No. 1 January 15, 1956 pp. 43-46." (PDF). http://ijs.sgmjournals.org/cgi/reprint/6/1/43.pdf. Retrieved 2010-03-28. 
  4. "International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature we site". Iczn.org. http://www.iczn.org/iczn/index.jsp?article=11&nfv=true. Retrieved 2010-03-28. 
  5. Sneath, P. H. A.. "A short history of the Bacteriological Code". http://www.the-icsp.org/misc/Code_history.htm. Retrieved 2007-10-29. 
  6. Heather Silyn-Roberts (2000). Writing for Science and Engineering: Papers, Presentation. p. 198. ISBN 0750646365. http://books.google.com/?id=hVUU7Gq8QskC&lpg=PA198&dq=species%20epithet%20capitalize&pg=PA198#v=onepage&q=species%20epithet%20capitalize. 
  7. "Recommendation 60F". International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, Vienna Code. 2006. pp. 60F.1. http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn/frameset/0065Ch7OaGoNSec1a60.htm#recF. 
  8. Charles F. Sturm, Timothy A. Pearce, Ángel Valdés (editors) (2006). The Mollusks: A Guide to Their Study, Collection, and Preservation. p. 147. ISBN 1581129300. http://books.google.com/?id=-NbmHx93s8gC&lpg=PA147&dq=species%20epithet%20capitalize&pg=PA147#v=onepage&q=chapter%2010. 
  9. Frank A. Bisby, Plant Names in Botanical Databases, Plant Taxonomic Database Standards No. 3, Version 1.00, December 1994, Published for the International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases for Plant Sciences (TDWG) by the Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

External links